Home
Cluster munitions 2022 report
GENEVA - Russian forces’ repeated use of cluster munitions has caused lasting harm to hundreds of Ukrainian civilians, according to this year’s global Cluster Munition Monitor report. Ukraine is the only country in the world where cluster munitions are being used today.
The report, which tracks efforts to eradicate cluster munitions by all countries, notes least 689 civilians died from cluster munition attacks between February and July. In Kharkiv, Ukraine’s second-largest city, Russian cluster munition attacks struck homes, city streets, and parks, as well as an outpatient clinic at a maternity hospital and a cultural center, a Human Rights Watch investigation found.
Ukrainian forces also appear to have used cluster munitions rockets on at least two occasions. The use of cluster munitions , which disperse submunitions that can maim and kill like landmines for years, is prohibited by the 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions.
110 countries have ratified and 13 more have signed the Convention, and while neither Russia nor Ukraine are parties to it, the indiscriminate nature of such weapons, particularly when deployed in built-up areas, would still make their use a likely war crime under international law.
“All countries should condemn the use of these weapons under any circumstances,” says Mary Wareham , arms advocacy director at Human Rights Watch and editor of the Cluster Munition Monitor 2022. The Cluster Munition Monitor is the annual monitoring report by the Cluster Munition Coalition (CMC), a global coalition of nongovernmental organizations co-founded and chaired by Human Rights Watch.
Cluster munitions can be fired from the ground by artillery, rockets, and mortars, or dropped by aircraft. They typically open in the air, dispersing multiple bomblets or submunitions over a wide area. Many submunitions fail to explode on initial impact, leaving dangerous duds that can indiscriminately maim and kill like landmines for years, until they are cleared and destroyed.
he report will be presented to countries attending the 10th annual meeting of the Convention on Cluster Munitions at the United Nations in Geneva next week.
Global nuclear arsenals are expected to grow, SIPRI Yearbook
Stockholm - The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) today launches the findings of SIPRI Yearbook 2022, which assesses the current state of armaments, disarmament and international security. A key finding is that despite a marginal decrease in the number of nuclear warheads in 2021, nuclear arsenals are expected to grow over the coming decade.
Signs that post-cold war decline in nuclear arsenals is ending
The nine nuclear-armed states—the United States, Russia, the United Kingdom, France, China, India, Pakistan, Israel and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea)—continue to modernize their nuclear arsenals and although the total number of nuclear weapons declined slightly between January 2021 and January 2022 (see table below), the number will probably increase in the next decade.
Of the total inventory of an estimated 12 705 warheads at the start of 2022, about 9440 were in military stockpiles for potential use. Of those, an estimated 3732 warheads were deployed with missiles and aircraft, and around 2000—nearly all of which belonged to Russia or the USA—were kept in a state of high operational alert.
Although Russian and US total warhead inventories continued to decline in 2021, this was due to the dismantling of warheads that had been retired from military service several years ago. The number of warheads in the two countries’ useable military stockpiles remained relatively stable in 2021. Both countries’ deployed strategic nuclear forces were within the limits set by a bilateral nuclear arms reduction treaty (2010 Treaty on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, New START). Note, however, that New START does not limit total non-strategic nuclear warhead inventories.
‘There are clear indications that the reductions that have characterized global nuclear arsenals since the end of the cold war have ended,’ said Hans M. Kristensen, Associate Senior Fellow with SIPRI’s Weapons of Mass Destruction Programme and Director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists (FAS).
‘All of the nuclear-armed states are increasing or upgrading their arsenals and most are sharpening nuclear rhetoric and the role nuclear weapons play in their military strategies,’ said Wilfred Wan, Director of SIPRI’s Weapons of Mass Destruction Programme. ‘This is a very worrying trend.’
Russia and the USA together possess over 90 per cent of all nuclear weapons. The other seven nuclear-armed states are either developing or deploying new weapon systems, or have announced their intention to do so. China is in the middle of a substantial expansion of its nuclear weapon arsenal, which satellite images indicate includes the construction of over 300 new missile silos. Several additional nuclear warheads are thought to have been assigned to operational forces in 2021 following the delivery of new mobile launchers and a submarine.
The UK in 2021 announced its decision to increase the ceiling on its total warhead stockpile, in a reversal of decades of gradual disarmament policies. While criticizing China and Russia for lack of nuclear transparency, the UK also announced that it would no longer publicly disclose figures for the country’s operational nuclear weapon stockpile, deployed warheads or deployed missiles.
In early 2021 France officially launched a programme to develop a third-generation nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine (SSBN). India and Pakistan appear to be expanding their nuclear arsenals, and both countries introduced and continued to develop new types of nuclear delivery system in 2021. Israel—which does not publicly acknowledge possessing nuclear weapons—is also believed to be modernizing its nuclear arsenal.
North Korea continues to prioritize its military nuclear programme as a central element of its national security strategy. While North Korea conducted no nuclear test explosions or long-range ballistic missile tests during 2021, SIPRI estimates that the country has now assembled up to 20 warheads, and possesses enough fissile material for a total of 45–55 warheads.
‘If the nuclear-armed states take no immediate and concrete action on disarmament, then the global inventory of nuclear warheads could soon begin to increase for the first time since the cold war,’ said Matt Korda, Associate Researcher with SIPRI’s Weapons of Mass Destruction Programme and Senior Research Associate with the FAS Nuclear Information Project.
Mixed signals from nuclear diplomacy
There were several landmarks in nuclear diplomacy during the past year. These included the entry into force of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) in January 2021, having received the required 50 state ratifications; the extension for five years of New START, the last remaining bilateral arms control agreement between the world’s two leading nuclear powers; and the start of talks on the USA rejoining, and Iran returning to compliance with, the Iran nuclear deal, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).
During 2021, the nuclear-armed permanent members (P5) of the United Nations Security Council—China, France, Russia, the UK and the USA—worked on a joint statement that they issued on 3 January 2022, affirming that ‘nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought’. They also reaffirmed their commitment to complying with non-proliferation, disarmament and arms control agreements and pledges as well as their obligations under the 1968 Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, and pursuing the goal of a world without nuclear weapons.
Despite this, all P5 members continue to expand or modernize their nuclear arsenals and appear to be increasing the salience of nuclear weapons in their military strategies. Russia has even made open threats about possible nuclear weapon use in the context of the war in Ukraine. Bilateral Russia–USA strategic stability talks have stalled because of the war, and none of the other nuclear-armed states are pursuing arms control negotiations. Moreover, the P5 members have voiced opposition to the TPNW, and the JCPOA negotiations have not yet reached a resolution.
‘Although there were some significant gains in both nuclear arms control and nuclear disarmament in the past year, the risk of nuclear weapons being used seems higher now than at any time since the height of the cold war,’ said SIPRI Director Dan Smith.
A mixed outlook for global security and stability
The 53rd edition of the SIPRI Yearbook reveals both negative and some hopeful developments in 2021.
‘Relations between the world’s great powers have deteriorated further at a time when humanity and the planet face an array of profound and pressing common challenges that can only be addressed by international cooperation,’ said Stefan Löfven, Chair of the SIPRI Governing Board.
In addition to its detailed coverage of nuclear arms control and non-proliferation issues, the latest edition of the SIPRI Yearbook includes insight on developments in conventional arms control in 2021; regional overviews of armed conflicts and conflict management; in-depth data and discussion on military expenditure, international arms transfers and arms production; and comprehensive coverage of efforts to counter chemical and biological security threats.
World military expenditure passes $2 trillion for first time
STOCKHOLM - Total global military expenditure increased by 0.7 per cent in real terms in 2021, to reach $2113 billion. The five largest spenders in 2021 were the United States, China, India, the United Kingdom and Russia, together accounting for 62 per cent of expenditure, according to new data on global military spending published today by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).
Read this press release in Catalan (PDF), French (PDF), Spanish (PDF) or Swedish (PDF).
Military expenditure reaches record level in the second year of the pandemic
World military spending continued to grow in 2021, reaching an all-time high of $2.1 trillion. This was the seventh consecutive year that spending increased.
‘Even amid the economic fallout of the Covid-19 pandemic, world military spending hit record levels,’ said Dr Diego Lopes da Silva, Senior Researcher with SIPRI’s Military Expenditure and Arms Production Programme. ‘There was a slowdown in the rate of real-terms growth due to inflation. In nominal terms, however, military spending grew by 6.1 per cent.’
As a result of a sharp economic recovery in 2021, the global military burden—world military expenditure as a share of world gross domestic product (GDP)—fell by 0.1 percentage points, from 2.3 per cent in 2020 to 2.2 per cent in 2021.
United States focuses on military research and development
US military spending amounted to $801 billion in 2021, a drop of 1.4 per cent from 2020. The US military burden decreased slightly from 3.7 per cent of GDP in 2020 to 3.5 per cent in 2021.
US funding for military research and development (R&D) rose by 24 per cent between 2012 and 2021, while arms procurement funding fell by 6.4 per cent over the same period. In 2021 spending on both decreased. However, the drop in R&D spending (–1.2 per cent) was smaller than that in arms procurement spending (–5.4 per cent).
‘The increase in R&D spending over the decade 2012–21 suggests that the United States is focusing more on next-generation technologies,’ said Alexandra Marksteiner, Researcher with SIPRI’s Military Expenditure and Arms Production Programme. ‘The US Government has repeatedly stressed the need to preserve the US military’s technological edge over strategic competitors.’
Russia increases military budget in run-up to war
Russia increased its military expenditure by 2.9 per cent in 2021, to $65.9 billion, at a time when it was building up its forces along the Ukrainian border. This was the third consecutive year of growth and Russia’s military spending reached 4.1 per cent of GDP in 2021.
‘High oil and gas revenues helped Russia to boost its military spending in 2021. Russian military expenditure had been in decline between 2016 and 2019 as a result of low energy prices combined with sanctions in response to Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014,’ said Lucie Béraud-Sudreau, Director of SIPRI’s Military Expenditure and Arms Production Programme.
The ‘national defence’ budget line, which accounts for around three-quarters of Russia’s total military spending and includes funding for operational costs as well as arms procurement, was revised upwards over the course of the year. The final figure was $48.4 billion, 14 per cent higher than had been budgeted at the end of 2020.
As it has strengthened its defences against Russia, Ukraine’s military spending has risen by 72 per cent since the annexation of Crimea in 2014. Spending fell in 2021, to $5.9 billion, but still accounted for 3.2 per cent of the country’s GDP.
Continued increases by major spenders in Asia and Oceania
China, the world’s second largest spender, allocated an estimated $293 billion to its military in 2021, an increase of 4.7 per cent compared with 2020. China’s military spending has grown for 27 consecutive years. The 2021 Chinese budget was the first under the 14th Five-Year Plan, which runs until 2025.
Following initial approval of its 2021 budget, the Japanese Government added $7.0 billion to military spending. As a result, spending rose by 7.3 per cent, to $54.1 billion in 2021, the highest annual increase since 1972. Australian military spending also increased in 2021: by 4.0 per cent, to reach $31.8 billion.
‘China’s growing assertiveness in and around the South and the East China seas have become a major driver of military spending in countries such as Australia and Japan,’ said SIPRI Senior Researcher Dr Nan Tian. ‘An example is the AUKUS trilateral security agreement between Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States that foresees the supply of eight nuclear-powered submarines to Australia at an estimated cost of up to $128 billion.’
Other notable developments:
- In 2021 Iran’s military budget increased for the first time in four years, to $24.6 billion. Funding for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps continued to grow in 2021—by 14 per cent compared with 2020—and accounted for 34 per cent of Iran’s total military spending.
- Eight European North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members reached the Alliance’s target of spending 2 per cent or more of GDP on their armed forces in 2021. This is one fewer than in 2020 but up from two in 2014.
- Nigeria raised its military spending by 56 per cent in 2021, to reach $4.5 billion. The rise came in response to numerous security challenges such as violent extremism and separatist insurgencies.
- Germany—the third largest spender in Central and Western Europe—spent $56.0 billion on its military in 2021, or 1.3 per cent of its GDP. Military spending was 1.4 per cent lower compared with 2020 due to inflation.
- In 2021 Qatar’s military spending was $11.6 billion, making it the fifth largest spender in the Middle East. Qatar’s military spending in 2021 was 434 per cent higher than in 2010, when the country last released spending data before 2021.
- India’s military spending of $76.6 billion ranked third highest in the world. This was up by 0.9 per cent from 2020 and by 33 per cent from 2012. In a push to strengthen the indigenous arms industry, 64 per cent of capital outlays in the military budget of 2021 were earmarked for acquisitions of domestically produced arms.
To download the SIPRI Fact Sheet, visit: https://www.sipri.org/publications/2022/sipri-fact-sheets/trends-world-military-expenditure-2021
Groundwater may be hidden but the secret to its sustainability is not
WASHINGTON - It has been said that the challenge of managing groundwater is not unlike the parable of the blind men and the elephant. Tasked with conceptualizing an elephant through touch alone, each man feels a different part of the large body, and ultimately, none are able to grasp the full reality of the animal. While groundwater is arguably the most important source of water on the planet, accounting for 97 percent of all freshwater on earth, the fact of its being hidden from view creates a cascade of challenges for its sustainable use and protection. The result is that groundwater quality management is almost universally neglected until the human and economic costs become too obvious to ignore.
A new World Bank publication, Seeing the Invisible – A Strategic Report on Groundwater Quality, rings the alarm bell about the status of the waters beneath our feet. Research conducted in the last half-century has revealed that contamination of groundwater resources is far more widespread and harmful than previously believed. Additionally, the ever-increasing contamination by anthropogenic pollutants — those caused by human actions, including by chemicals that did not exist or were barely recognized as contaminants a few years ago — pose problems on a scale that is often not appreciated.
When groundwater is compromised, the consequences for human health, agriculture, and the economy are far reaching and can span generations, with disproportionately large impacts for the global poor. And as water variability increases with climate change, groundwater’s importance as both a source and store of water will increase.
On top of this is the growing realization that, once polluted, the restoration of aquifers to a state fit for use is difficult, expensive, and very slow. The intergenerational human and economic costs of what are avoidable phenomena are measured in hundreds of millions of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars.
There is good news, however, while cleaning-up pollution is technically challenging, expensive, and time-consuming, groundwater quality protection is comparatively simple and economical. The cost of protection measures is negligible compared with having to replace a single public water source. So why is groundwater routinely neglected by many water resources professionals? There are several explanations.
First, people tend to distrust what they cannot see. They find it difficult to sense how much water is available, let alone how its quality varies with location and depth. For many, aquifers are challenging to visualize. Second, water resources management is too often compartmentalized with technical specialists managing surface water, groundwater and land planning as separate disciplines; and water quality largely considered the domain of laboratories. Third, most water resources managers and administrators tend to lack expertise in groundwater and have limited connection with the private sector and utility stakeholders who are the main groundwater users.
The Seeing the Invisible report addresses these issues by demystifying what is happening below the surface of the earth and provides practical guide for protecting this most vital resource, including how to:
- Improve groundwater quality monitoring — a precondition for all other actions that should be undertaken as a top priority — through proper aquifer characterization, baseline measurement, and following monitoring and management best practices.
- Reform legislation so that groundwater protection measures are established as part of legally binding planning and land-use controls.
- Strengthen institutions to bring together the different water management disciplines and better accommodate both groundwater and water quality more broadly by providing adequate budget, proper recruitment, and training matched to the needs of management objectives.
- Prevent pollution from occurring in the first place through the establishment of source protection zones around groundwater abstraction points.
While transforming every decision maker whose sphere of influence impacts groundwater into a subject matter expert over the course of one report is not practical, equipping each reader with the ability to investigate the connections between the seen and the unseen, is. The report provides decision makers with a set of tools and approaches to conceptualize, examine, and develop an informed understanding of groundwater, even without knowing all the technicalities. With groundwater on the global agenda as the theme of World Water Day 2022, the benefits of informed and inclusive engagement have never been greater.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
- Groundwater, which accounts for 97 percent of global freshwater resources, is essential to human and economic development, but its contamination is more extensive and harmful than previously thought.
- Groundwater quality management is almost universally neglected until the human and economic costs become too obvious to ignore, even though the challenge and cost of cleaning up polluted groundwater, or treating it in perpetuity, is far greater than protecting it in the first place.
- A new publication, "Seeing the Invisible – A Strategic Report on Groundwater Quality," aims to equip readers, specialists, and non-specialists alike to protect and manage this vital resource.
Page 4 of 36
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 90
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 96
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 90
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 96
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 90
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 96
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 90
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 96
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 90
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 96
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 90
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 96
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 90
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 96
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 90
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 96
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 90
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 96
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 90
Warning: Illegal string offset 'active' in /home/cemasorg/public_html/templates/northsouthnews/html/pagination.php on line 96